Film comparison
Harman Technology Phoenix 125 vs Harman Technology Phoenix II 200
- Phoenix II 200 is 0.7 stops faster (ISO 200 vs 125).
Side by side
| Phoenix 125 | Phoenix II 200 | |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Harman Technology | Harman Technology |
| Type | Colour negative | Colour negative |
| Box speed | ISO 125 | ISO 200 |
| Process | C-41 | C-41 |
| Formats | 35mm, 120 | 35mm, 120 |
| Grain | Coarse | — |
| Contrast | High | — |
| Latitude | Narrow | — |
| Saturation | Vibrant | — |
| Price, 35mm | — | — |
| Price, 120 | — | — |
| Availability | Current | Current |
Rows that differ are in bold. Prices are typical UK prices and change often.
How they look
- Phoenix 125
- August 2026 re-release of the original Phoenix emulsion re-rated to ISO 125: high contrast, strong visible grain, prone to halation and best in consistent good light.
- Phoenix II 200
- Second-generation Harman colour negative with redesigned layers, dyes and couplers; Harman says it improves contrast, grain, sharpness and highlight/shadow retention over the original, though it still rewards accurate exposure.
Which suits what
Better pick: Phoenix 125
Bright daylight
Both work well
Creative
Better pick: Phoenix II 200
Daylight