Film comparison
Lomography Lomography Color Negative 400 vs Lomography Color Tiger 200 (110)
- Lomography Color Negative 400 is a stop faster (ISO 400 vs 200).
Side by side
| Lomography Color Negative 400 | Color Tiger 200 (110) | |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Lomography | Lomography |
| Type | Colour negative | Colour negative |
| Box speed | ISO 400 | ISO 200 |
| Process | C-41 | C-41 |
| Formats | 35mm, 120, 110 | 110 |
| Grain | Medium | — |
| Contrast | Medium high | — |
| Latitude | Good | — |
| Saturation | High | — |
| Price, 35mm | about £11.33 | — |
| Price, 120 | about £9.33 | — |
| Availability | Current | Current |
Rows that differ are in bold. Prices are typical UK prices and change often.
How they look
- Lomography Color Negative 400
- Budget-friendly versatile colour film with vibrant colours and good exposure latitude. Pleasant grain structure. Excellent value especially in multi-packs.
- Color Tiger 200 (110)
- General-purpose colour negative in 110 cartridges.
Which suits what
Better pick: Lomography Color Negative 400
Everyday, Travel, Street photography
Both work well
—
Better pick: Color Tiger 200 (110)
110 cameras
Long exposures (reciprocity)
| Metered | Lomography Color Negative 400 | Color Tiger 200 (110) |
|---|---|---|
| 1s | 1s | No data |
| 10s | 20s | No data |
| 30s | 1m 23s | No data |
| 2m | 8m 25s | No data |
Corrected exposure from each film’s published reciprocity data. Reciprocity calculator