Film comparison
Rera Rera Pan 400 (127) vs Rollei RPX 400
On paper these two films are very close. The differences are in the look.
Open in the compare toolSide by side
| Rera Pan 400 (127) | RPX 400 | |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Rera | Rollei |
| Type | Black & white | Black & white |
| Box speed | ISO 400 | ISO 400 |
| Process | B&W | B&W |
| Formats | 127 | 35mm, 120 |
| Grain | — | Medium |
| Contrast | — | Medium |
| Latitude | — | Excellent |
| Saturation | — | — |
| Price, 35mm | — | about £8.00 |
| Price, 120 | — | about £7.50 |
| Availability | Current | Current |
Rows that differ are in bold. Prices are typical UK prices and change often.
How they look
- Rera Pan 400 (127)
- Traditional high-speed panchromatic B&W in 127; supplier recommends processing as Rollei RPX 400.
- RPX 400
- High-speed panchromatic with good edge sharpness and high resolving power. Wide tonal range ideal for sports and reportage.
Which suits what
Better pick: Rera Pan 400 (127)
127 cameras
Both work well
—
Better pick: RPX 400
Street photography, Reportage, General purpose
Long exposures (reciprocity)
| Metered | Rera Pan 400 (127) | RPX 400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1s | No data | 1s |
| 10s | No data | 20s |
| 30s | No data | 1m 23s |
| 2m | No data | 8m 25s |
Corrected exposure from each film’s published reciprocity data. Reciprocity calculator