Film comparison
Rollei/Maco Digibase CR 200 vs Agfa Agfachrome RSX II 200
On paper these two films are very close. The differences are in the look.
Open in the compare toolSide by side
| Specification | Digibase CR 200 | Agfachrome RSX II 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Rollei/Maco | Agfa |
| Type | Colour slide | Colour slide |
| Box speed | ISO 200 | ISO 200 |
| Process | E-6 | E-6 |
| Formats | 35mm, 120 | 35mm, 120 |
| Grain | — | — |
| Contrast | — | — |
| Latitude | — | — |
| Saturation | — | — |
| Price, 35mm | — | — |
| Price, 120 | — | — |
| Availability | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Rows that differ are in bold. Prices are typical UK prices and change often.
How they look
- Digibase CR 200
- Older-aesthetic slide film from Agfa-Gevaert Aviphot Chrome 200.
- Agfachrome RSX II 200
- Professional slide film that many users found natural with flattering skin tones. Wikipedia says Agfa-Gevaert kept making the emulsion on polyester as Aviphot Chrome 200 PE1 after AgfaPhoto closed, converted by Maco as Rollei CR 200 and sold as Lomography X-Pro 200.
Which suits what
Better pick: Digibase CR 200
—
Both work well
—
Better pick: Agfachrome RSX II 200
Portrait, Cross processing