Film comparison
Adox HR-50 vs Agfa Copex Rapid
On paper these two films are very close. The differences are in the look.
Open in the compare toolSide by side
| Specification | HR-50 | Copex Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Adox | Agfa |
| Type | Black & white | Black & white |
| Box speed | ISO 50 | ISO 50 |
| Process | B&W | B&W |
| Formats | 35mm, 120, 4x5 | 35mm, 120 |
| Grain | Very fine | — |
| Contrast | — | — |
| Latitude | — | — |
| Saturation | — | — |
| Price, 35mm | — | — |
| Price, 120 | — | — |
| Availability | Current | Current |
Rows that differ are in bold. Prices are typical UK prices and change often.
How they look
- HR-50
- Ultra-fine-grain super-panchromatic film on PET, modified by ADOX from an Agfa-Gevaert aerial emulsion; up to 280 lp/mm and usable for infrared with filtration.
- Copex Rapid
- High-resolution panchromatic black-and-white microfilm from Agfa-Gevaert with an anti-halation underlayer, converted for still cameras by Maco. Wikipedia's list notes the same film is sold as SPUR DSX.
Which suits what
Better pick: HR-50
Landscape, Architecture
Both work well
—
Better pick: Copex Rapid
Fine detail, Technical
Long exposures (reciprocity)
| Metered | HR-50 | Copex Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 1s | 1s | No data |
| 10s | 17s | No data |
| 30s | 1m 16s | No data |
| 2m | No data | No data |
Corrected exposure from each film’s published reciprocity data. Reciprocity calculator