Film comparison
Kodak Vision3 200T 5213 vs KONO! Kolorit 125 Tungsten
- Vision3 200T 5213 is 0.7 stops faster (ISO 200 vs 125).
- They use different processes: Vision3 200T 5213 is ECN-2, Kolorit 125 Tungsten is C-41.
Side by side
| Vision3 200T 5213 | Kolorit 125 Tungsten | |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Kodak | KONO! |
| Type | Cinema | Colour negative |
| Box speed | ISO 200 | ISO 125 |
| Process | ECN-2 | C-41 |
| Formats | 35mm | 35mm |
| Grain | — | — |
| Contrast | — | — |
| Latitude | — | — |
| Saturation | — | — |
| Price, 35mm | — | — |
| Price, 120 | — | — |
| Availability | Current | Current |
Rows that differ are in bold. Prices are typical UK prices and change often.
How they look
- Vision3 200T 5213
- Tungsten-balanced 200-speed motion picture negative that Kodak positions as having 100-speed image structure; respooled for stills by several brands.
- Kolorit 125 Tungsten
- Tungsten-balanced motion picture colour stock prepared for C-41.
Which suits what
Better pick: Vision3 200T 5213
Interiors
Both work well
Artificial light
Better pick: Kolorit 125 Tungsten
—