Film comparison
Lomography LomoChrome Classicolor 200 vs Lomography LomoChrome Color '92
- LomoChrome Color '92 is a stop faster (ISO 400 vs 200).
- LomoChrome Color '92 is harder to find.
Side by side
| LomoChrome Classicolor 200 | LomoChrome Color '92 | |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Lomography | Lomography |
| Type | Colour negative | Colour negative |
| Box speed | ISO 200 | ISO 400 |
| Process | C-41 | C-41 |
| Formats | 35mm, 110 | 35mm, 120, 110 |
| Grain | — | — |
| Contrast | — | — |
| Latitude | — | — |
| Saturation | Moderate | — |
| Price, 35mm | — | — |
| Price, 120 | — | — |
| Availability | Current | Limited |
Rows that differ are in bold. Prices are typical UK prices and change often.
How they look
- LomoChrome Classicolor 200
- 2025 general-purpose colour negative with saturated but restrained colour, warm reds and subtler blues/greens; added in 110 in 2026.
- LomoChrome Color '92
- Retro colour negative with grain and hues meant to evoke 1990s consumer film; a 'Sun-kissed' warmer variant followed in 2024.
Which suits what
Better pick: LomoChrome Classicolor 200
Portraits
Both work well
Everyday
Better pick: LomoChrome Color '92
Nostalgic