Film comparison
Kodak Gold 200 vs Lomography LomoChrome Classicolor 200
On paper these two films are very close. The differences are in the look.
Open in the compare toolSide by side
| Gold 200 | LomoChrome Classicolor 200 | |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Kodak | Lomography |
| Type | Colour negative | Colour negative |
| Box speed | ISO 200 | ISO 200 |
| Process | C-41 | C-41 |
| Formats | 35mm, 120 | 35mm, 110 |
| Grain | Medium | — |
| Contrast | Medium high | — |
| Latitude | Good | — |
| Saturation | High | Moderate |
| Price, 35mm | about £8.50 | — |
| Price, 120 | about £8.50 | — |
| Availability | Current | Current |
Rows that differ are in bold. Prices are typical UK prices and change often.
How they look
- Gold 200
- Classic nostalgic warm tones. Reintroduced in 120 format in 2022, offering pro-level results for a budget price in medium format.
- LomoChrome Classicolor 200
- 2025 general-purpose colour negative with saturated but restrained colour, warm reds and subtler blues/greens; added in 110 in 2026.
Which suits what
Better pick: Gold 200
Holiday, Sunny days, General purpose
Both work well
—
Better pick: LomoChrome Classicolor 200
Everyday, Portraits
Long exposures (reciprocity)
| Metered | Gold 200 | LomoChrome Classicolor 200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1s | 1s | No data |
| 10s | 20s | No data |
| 30s | 1m 23s | No data |
| 2m | 8m 25s | No data |
Corrected exposure from each film’s published reciprocity data. Reciprocity calculator
More comparisons
- Aurora 400 vs Gold 200
- Color Mission 200 vs Gold 200
- ColorPlus 200 vs Gold 200
- Fujicolor 100 vs Gold 200
- Gold 200 vs Kodacolor 100
- Gold 200 vs Kodacolor 200
- Gold 200 vs ProImage 100
- Gold 200 vs Lomography Color Negative 100
- Gold 200 vs C200
- Gold 200 vs Phoenix 200
- Gold 200 vs Portra 400
- Gold 200 vs Revolog Creative Series
- Gold 200 vs Superia X-TRA 400
- Gold 200 vs Ultramax 400
- Gold 200 vs Wolfen NC500
- LomoChrome Classicolor 200 vs LomoChrome Color '92