Skip to main content

Film comparison

Lomography LomoChrome Metropolis vs Kodak Portra 400

  • Portra 400 is 2 stops faster (ISO 400 vs 100).
  • Portra 400 has finer grain.
  • LomoChrome Metropolis has more contrast.
  • Portra 400 is more forgiving of exposure errors.
  • LomoChrome Metropolis is cheaper in 35mm (about £15.00 vs £18.99).
Open in the compare tool

Side by side

LomoChrome MetropolisPortra 400
ManufacturerLomographyKodak
TypeColour negativeColour negative
Box speedISO 100ISO 400
ProcessC-41C-41
Formats35mm, 12035mm, 120, 4x5, 8x10
GrainMediumVery fine
ContrastHighMedium
LatitudeGoodExcellent
SaturationLowModerate
Price, 35mmabout £15.00about £18.99
Price, 120about £14.00about £16.95
AvailabilityCurrentCurrent

Rows that differ are in bold. Prices are typical UK prices and change often.

How they look

LomoChrome Metropolis
Lomography's cinematic colour negative designed for urban and street photography. Produces heavily desaturated, cool-toned images with a distinctive film noir aesthetic—greens shift toward teal, reds become muted, and skin tones take on a unique character. Can be rated anywhere from ISO 100 to 400, with underexposure pushing the desaturated look further. Best suited for overcast days, concrete environments, and photographers seeking a moody, editorial look straight out of camera.
Portra 400
Widely regarded as the industry standard for professional colour work. Vision3 technology provides exceptionally fine grain and impressive exposure latitude.

Which suits what

Better pick: LomoChrome Metropolis

Urban photography, Moody scenes, Creative work

Both work well

—

Better pick: Portra 400

Weddings, Commercial editorial, Travel

Long exposures (reciprocity)

MeteredLomoChrome MetropolisPortra 400
1sNo data1s
10sNo data22s
30sNo data1m 39s
2mNo data10m 41s

Corrected exposure from each film’s published reciprocity data. Reciprocity calculator

More comparisons

Support