Skip to main content

Film comparison

Kodak Gold 200 vs Kodak Portra 400

  • Portra 400 is a stop faster (ISO 400 vs 200).
  • Portra 400 has finer grain.
  • Portra 400 is more forgiving of exposure errors.
  • Gold 200 is cheaper in 35mm (about £8.50 vs £18.99).
Open in the compare tool

Side by side

Gold 200Portra 400
ManufacturerKodakKodak
TypeColour negativeColour negative
Box speedISO 200ISO 400
ProcessC-41C-41
Formats35mm, 12035mm, 120, 4x5, 8x10
GrainMediumVery fine
ContrastMedium highMedium
LatitudeGoodExcellent
SaturationHighModerate
Price, 35mmabout £8.50about £18.99
Price, 120about £8.50about £16.95
AvailabilityCurrentCurrent

Rows that differ are in bold. Prices are typical UK prices and change often.

How they look

Gold 200
Classic nostalgic warm tones. Reintroduced in 120 format in 2022, offering pro-level results for a budget price in medium format.
Portra 400
Widely regarded as the industry standard for professional colour work. Vision3 technology provides exceptionally fine grain and impressive exposure latitude.

Which suits what

Better pick: Gold 200

Holiday, Sunny days, General purpose

Both work well

—

Better pick: Portra 400

Weddings, Commercial editorial, Travel

Long exposures (reciprocity)

MeteredGold 200Portra 400
1s1s1s
10s20s22s
30s1m 23s1m 39s
2m8m 25s10m 41s

Corrected exposure from each film’s published reciprocity data. Reciprocity calculator

Developing both

Developers with published times for both films:

More comparisons

Support