Film comparison
Flic Film Aurora 400 vs Kodak Gold 200
- Aurora 400 is a stop faster (ISO 400 vs 200).
- Gold 200 is cheaper in 35mm (about £8.50 vs £14.00).
Side by side
| Aurora 400 | Gold 200 | |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Flic Film | Kodak |
| Type | Colour negative | Colour negative |
| Box speed | ISO 400 | ISO 200 |
| Process | C-41 | C-41 |
| Formats | 35mm | 35mm, 120 |
| Grain | Medium | Medium |
| Contrast | Medium | Medium high |
| Latitude | Good | Good |
| Saturation | Moderate | High |
| Price, 35mm | about £14.00 | about £8.50 |
| Price, 120 | — | about £8.50 |
| Availability | Current | Current |
Rows that differ are in bold. Prices are typical UK prices and change often.
How they look
- Aurora 400
- Native C-41 film (not remjet-removed cinema stock). Balanced colors with accurate skin tones and high dynamic range. New 2025 release.
- Gold 200
- Classic nostalgic warm tones. Reintroduced in 120 format in 2022, offering pro-level results for a budget price in medium format.
Which suits what
Better pick: Aurora 400
Portraits, Everyday
Both work well
General purpose
Better pick: Gold 200
Holiday, Sunny days
Long exposures (reciprocity)
| Metered | Aurora 400 | Gold 200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1s | No data | 1s |
| 10s | No data | 20s |
| 30s | No data | 1m 23s |
| 2m | No data | 8m 25s |
Corrected exposure from each film’s published reciprocity data. Reciprocity calculator