Film comparison
Kodak Gold 200 vs Kodak Kodacolor 200
- Kodacolor 200 has finer grain.
- Kodacolor 200 is more forgiving of exposure errors.
Side by side
| Gold 200 | Kodacolor 200 | |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Kodak | Kodak |
| Type | Colour negative | Colour negative |
| Box speed | ISO 200 | ISO 200 |
| Process | C-41 | C-41 |
| Formats | 35mm, 120 | 35mm |
| Grain | Medium | Fine |
| Contrast | Medium high | — |
| Latitude | Good | Excellent |
| Saturation | High | High |
| Price, 35mm | about £8.50 | — |
| Price, 120 | about £8.50 | — |
| Availability | Current | Current |
Rows that differ are in bold. Prices are typical UK prices and change often.
How they look
- Gold 200
- Classic nostalgic warm tones. Reintroduced in 120 format in 2022, offering pro-level results for a budget price in medium format.
- Kodacolor 200
- Medium-speed daylight colour negative launched by Eastman Kodak in October 2025; Kodak markets it for fine grain, saturated colour, sharpness and wide exposure latitude. Base emulsion not disclosed.
Which suits what
Better pick: Gold 200
Holiday, Sunny days, General purpose
Both work well
—
Better pick: Kodacolor 200
General photography, Travel
Long exposures (reciprocity)
| Metered | Gold 200 | Kodacolor 200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1s | 1s | No data |
| 10s | 20s | No data |
| 30s | 1m 23s | No data |
| 2m | 8m 25s | No data |
Corrected exposure from each film’s published reciprocity data. Reciprocity calculator
More comparisons
- Aurora 400 vs Gold 200
- Color Mission 200 vs Gold 200
- ColorPlus 200 vs Gold 200
- Fujicolor 100 vs Gold 200
- Gold 200 vs Kodacolor 100
- Gold 200 vs ProImage 100
- Gold 200 vs LomoChrome Classicolor 200
- Gold 200 vs Lomography Color Negative 100
- Gold 200 vs C200
- Gold 200 vs Phoenix 200
- Gold 200 vs Portra 400
- Gold 200 vs Revolog Creative Series
- Gold 200 vs Superia X-TRA 400
- Gold 200 vs Ultramax 400
- Gold 200 vs Wolfen NC500
- ColorPlus 200 vs Kodacolor 200